Leahy and Hatch on Patent Reform Act of 2007 - we’re making progress beacuse no one is entirely happy

This morning’s Washington Times includes Meaningful Patent Reform, an op/ed piece co-authored by Senators Leahy and Hatch. Characterizing themselves as “close partners on intellectual property issues,” the current and immediate past chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee pitched their case for passage of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007.

The primary rationale advanced by the Senators can be paraphrased as such:

Congress has neglected to modernize our patent system to keep pace with the boom in American innovation. Recent Supreme Court decisions have nudged things in the right direction…[b]ut the Court is constrained in its decisions by the laws on the books….If we are to maintain our position at the forefront of the global economy and continue to lead the world in innovation and production, we need an efficient and streamlined patent system that issues high-quality patents while limiting wheel spinning and counterproductive litigation.

The article specifically notes the post grant review, forum shopping (venue), and inequitable conduct reform measures contained in the bill. It also carefully addresses the controversial damages provision which appears to be the key sticking point at this time:

We must also restore fairness to the rules that govern how courts determine damages when a patent is infringed. The threat of excessive damages is ruthlessly curtailing progress, and the loss of jobs and innovation is directly linked to litigation costs. But we must be careful to strike the right balance so that violating the intellectual property rights of others does not just become an acceptable cost of doing business. The goal of our reforms is to ensure that patent holders will be able to obtain appropriate compensation in case of infringement.

The Senators close with an interesting note about the bill’s progress to date:

As legislators, we know we are headed in the right direction when everyone is complaining that the entire bill is not going their way. We see this as a necessary, albeit somewhat difficult, part of the legislative process. But we welcome it. But at the end of day, we are confident that we will resolve the remaining issues in ways that should make everyone comfortable and will ensure final passage.