Comments on: Placing limits on continuation practice - does the Patent Act of 2005 imply a current absence of authority? http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/placing-limits-on-continuation-practice-does-the-patent-act-of-2005-imply-a-current-absence-of-authority/542/ Insightful writings on all aspects of US patent law Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:17:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Michael L. Slonecker http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/placing-limits-on-continuation-practice-does-the-patent-act-of-2005-imply-a-current-absence-of-authority/542/#comment-90 Michael L. Slonecker Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:44:00 +0000 http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/2006/05/25/placing-limits-on-continuation-practice-does-the-patent-act-of-2005-imply-a-current-absence-of-authority/#comment-90 Out of curiosity, has an "answer" to this question been posited. I too have great difficulty reconciling the proposed rule changing continuation practice with the current Section 120. And, yes, I do believe that the proposed legislation concerning granting particularized authority to the PTO is relevant. Out of curiosity, has an “answer” to this question been posited. I too have great difficulty reconciling the proposed rule changing continuation practice with the current Section 120.

And, yes, I do believe that the proposed legislation concerning granting particularized authority to the PTO is relevant.

]]>