San Jose Mercury News - The Federal Circuit has contributed mightily to the madness

The San Jose Mercury News is running an interesting editorial that strongly criticizes the current patent system. It’s one of the first I’ve seen that places significant blame for the current situation on the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Sure, plenty have criticized the Court before, but none have used such strong language.

Clearly timed for the KSR v. Teleflex debate, the piece is chok full of money quotes. Here’s two:

“The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which handles all patent appeals, has contributed mightily to the madness by laying down a set of rigid rules that make it too easy to get a patent, virtually impossible to overturn one after it’s granted — and prohibitively expensive to even try.”

“To help decide this, the high court and Congress have, over many decades, issued guidelines that take into account prior inventions and the knowledge that an ordinary person working in the field would have. Unfortunately, the appeals court has concocted a three-part test for obviousness that sets an unreasonably high barrier for anyone seeking to invalidate a patent that simply combines old, established ideas into a new one. (During oral arguments this week, Justice Antonin Scalia, not exactly a dimwit, noted the test amounted to “gobbledygook.”) Inventors need a more clear and, yes, obvious, standard of obviousness.”

You might enjoy these related posts:

1. While the Supreme Court considers KSR v. Teleflex, one hand of the Federal Circuit polishes the TSM test and the other tarnishes it As the Supreme Court considers the propriety of the teaching...
2. KSR v. Teleflex - The Supreme Court reveals its frustration with the motivation/suggestion test…and contempt for the Federal Circuit And now we wait. Yesterday, the much-anticipated oral argument was...
3. KSR v. Teleflex - get back to where you once belonged My review of the KSR v. Teleflex opinion is now...
4. CAFC: Hey reformers…obviousness law is just fine, thank you In Dystar Textilfarben v. C.H. Patrick, the Court of Appeals...
5. Here we go again - US Supreme Court to consider reforming standard for obviousness Yesterday, the Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited decision on the...

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Powered by Wordpress | WP Premium theme by WP Remix
Copyright 2007. The Promote the Progress blog. All rights reserved

• Home